The General Office of the Central Committee of the CPC issued the ＂Regulations on the Assessment of Leading Cadres of the Party and Government＂
Xinhua News Agency, Beijing, April 21st-Recently, the General Office of the Central Committee of the CPC issued the Regulations on the Assessment of Leading Cadres of the Party and Government (hereinafter referred to as the Regulations on the Assessment of Cadres), and issued a notice asking all localities and departments to follow them carefully.
The notice pointed out that cadre assessment is an important measure to uphold and strengthen the party’s overall leadership, promote the implementation of the decision-making arrangements of the CPC Central Committee, and is an important starting point for encouraging cadres to take responsibility and promote career development. Under the guidance of Socialism with Chinese characteristics Thought of the Supreme Leader in the New Era, the Regulations on Cadre Assessment implements the general requirements of Party building and the organizational line of the Party in the new era, and provides basic guidance for doing a good job in cadre assessment in the new era.
The circular stressed that the promulgation and implementation of the Regulations on the Assessment of Cadres is of great significance for further exerting the role of baton, vane and booster in the assessment of cadres, encouraging and guiding the broad masses of cadres to implement the decision-making arrangements of the CPC Central Committee in a better state and a more practical style, and promoting the unity of the will, actions and pace of the whole party.
The notice requires that party committees (party groups) at all levels should profoundly understand the spirit of the CPC Central Committee, earnestly fulfill their main responsibilities, and study, publicize and implement the Regulations on Cadre Assessment. It is necessary to take a clear-cut stand and put political standards throughout the assessment of cadres, highlight the assessment of the decision-making and deployment of the CPC Central Committee and the implementation of the important instructions of the General Secretary of the Supreme Leader, and ensure that party and government leading bodies and leading cadres at all levels maintain a high degree of consistency with the CPC Central Committee with the Supreme Leader as the core in political stance, political direction, political principles and political road. It is necessary to take distinguishing the good from the bad, rewarding the good and punishing the bad, encouraging responsibility and promoting development as the basic tasks of cadre assessment, further adjust and optimize assessment content indicators, improve assessment methods and methods, strengthen the application of assessment results, maximize the enthusiasm, initiative and creativity of cadres, and promote the establishment of a clear orientation of stressing responsibility, shouldering heavy responsibilities, reform and innovation, and starting a business for officials. All localities and departments in the implementation of the "Regulations" in the important situation and suggestions, to report to the CPC Central Committee in a timely manner.
The full text of the "Regulations on the Assessment of Leading Cadres of the Party and Government" is as follows.
Chapter I General Provisions
Article 1 In order to uphold and strengthen the Party’s overall leadership, insist that the Party should govern the Party and strictly manage the Party in an all-round way, promote party and government leading bodies and leading cadres at all levels to be loyal and clean, take the lead in implementing the decision-making arrangements of the CPC Central Committee, improve the cadre evaluation mechanism, and build a team of high-quality party and government leading cadres with firm beliefs, serving the people, being diligent and pragmatic, daring to take responsibility, being honest and clean, these Regulations are formulated in accordance with the Constitution of the Communist Party of China and relevant laws.
Article 2 The term "assessment work" as mentioned in these Regulations refers to the understanding, verification and evaluation of the political quality, performance ability, work effect and work style of the party and government leading bodies and leading cadres by the party committees (leading groups) and their organization (personnel) departments in accordance with the cadre management authority, as an important basis for strengthening the construction of leading bodies and leading cadres.
The assessment methods mainly include usual assessment, annual assessment, special assessment and term assessment.
Article 3 The assessment work is guided by Marxism–Leninism, Mao Zedong Thought, Deng Xiaoping Theory, Theory of Three Represents, Scientific Outlook on Development and the Supreme Leader’s Thought of the New Era, implements the general requirements for Party building and the Party’s organizational line in the new era, insists on putting political standards first, focuses on achieving the goal of "two hundred years", and highlights the assessment and implementation of major decisions and arrangements of the CPC Central Committee. Make overall plans to promote the overall layout of the "Five in One" and coordinate the promotion of the "Four Comprehensive" strategic layout, and implement the actual results of the new development concept, adhere to the combination of strict management and love, pay equal attention to incentives and constraints, reward diligence and punish laziness, reward the superior and punish the inferior, mobilize the enthusiasm, initiative and creativity of party and government leading bodies and leading cadres at all levels, and establish a clear orientation of stressing responsibility, shouldering heavy responsibilities, reform and innovation, and starting businesses by officials.
Fourth assessment work adhere to the following principles:
(a) the party is in charge of cadres;
(2) Having both ability and political integrity and putting morality first;
(three) the cause is the best, fair and decent;
(four) pay attention to performance, recognized by the masses;
(five) objective, comprehensive, simple and effective;
(six) the combination of examination and use, rewards and punishments.
Article 5 These Regulations shall apply to the assessment of the leading bodies and leading cadres of the working departments or relevant working institutions in the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, the National People’s Congress Standing Committee (NPCSC), the State Council and Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference; Leading bodies and leading cadres of the State Supervision Commission of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection (excluding full-time posts); The Supreme People’s Court and the Supreme People’s Procuratorate leading bodies and leading cadres (excluding full-time positions); Leading bodies and leading cadres of local party committees, NPC Standing Committees, governments, CPPCC, Commission for Discipline Inspection, courts and procuratorates at or above the county level; Leading bodies and leading cadres of local party committees, NPC Standing Committees, governments, CPPCC departments or relevant working institutions at or above the county level.
With reference to the assessment of leading bodies and leading cadres of party committees and institutions directly under the government and mass organizations at or above the county level managed by the Civil Service Law, these Regulations shall apply.
Article 6 The leading bodies and leading cadres of the central and state organs should play an exemplary role in ideological and political actions and take the lead in accepting high standards and strict examinations.
Chapter II Assessment Contents
Article 7 The assessment contents of leading bodies mainly include:
(1) Political and ideological construction. Comprehensively assess the situation that the leading bodies resolutely safeguard the core position of the Party Central Committee and the whole Party, the authority of the Party Central Committee and centralized and unified leadership, uphold and strengthen the overall leadership of the Party, implement the Party’s theory, line, principles and policies, enhance the "four consciousnesses", achieve "four obeisances" and abide by political discipline and rules; Arm your mind with the Supreme Leader’s Socialism with Chinese characteristics Thought in the new era, strengthen your ideals and beliefs, strengthen the "four self-confidences", Do not forget your initiative mind, and keep in mind the mission; Adhere to democratic centralism, implement some norms of inner-party political life under the new situation, find and solve their own problems, and create a clean and honest political ecology; Practice the party’s organizational line in the new era, implement the standards of good cadres in the new era, and establish a correct orientation for selecting and employing people.
(2) Leadership. Comprehensively assess the ability of the leading group to adapt to the requirements of the new era, implement the decision-making and deployment of the CPC Central Committee, and complete the objectives and tasks, focusing on learning skills, political leadership skills, reform and innovation skills, scientific development skills, ruling by law skills, mass work skills, paying close attention to implementation skills, and controlling risks.
(3) Work performance. Comprehensively assess the outlook on political achievements and work effectiveness of the leading bodies. The assessment of political achievements mainly depends on whether you abide by the concept of building the party for the public and governing for the people, whether you have the spirit of "I don’t have to be successful", take the benefit of the people as the greatest political achievement, and truly be responsible for history and the people. To assess the performance of local party committees and government leading bodies, we should look at the overall work, the situation and actual results of promoting economic, political, cultural, social and ecological civilization construction in the region, solving the problem of insufficient development imbalance and meeting the people’s growing needs for a better life. Assessing the work performance of other leading bodies mainly depends on the overall performance of functions, service to the overall situation and central work and the actual results. Pay attention to the assessment of the leading bodies of party committees (party groups) at all levels to implement the general requirements of party building in the new era and grasp the achievements of party building work.
(4) Building a clean and honest party style. Comprehensively assess the leading bodies’ performance of the political responsibility of managing the party, strengthening the building of a clean and honest party style, persevering in discipline and discipline, and promoting the anti-corruption struggle.
(5) Work style construction. Comprehensively assess the leading bodies’ adherence to the people-centered principle, implementation of the Party’s mass line, close contact with the masses, solving problems for the masses and serving the people wholeheartedly; Combine the actual implementation of the decision-making arrangements of the CPC Central Committee to enhance people’s sense of acquisition, happiness and security; Deeply improve the style of work, implement the spirit of the eight central regulations and their implementation rules, and oppose the "four winds", especially formalism and bureaucracy; Seeking truth from facts, working hard, observing the truth, making practical moves, doing practical things and seeking practical results.
Eighth leading cadres assessment content mainly includes:
(1) Germany. Comprehensively assess the political quality and moral conduct of leading cadres. Assess the political quality of leading cadres, focusing on understanding the situation of firm ideals and beliefs, loyalty to the Party, respect for party constitution, observing political discipline and rules, and maintaining a high degree of consistency with the CPC Central Committee with the Supreme Leader as the core in ideological and political actions. Assess the moral conduct of leading cadres, focusing on adhering to the values of loyalty, honesty, fairness and decency, seeking truth from facts, honesty and integrity, and observing social morality, professional ethics, family virtues and personal morality.
(2) can. Comprehensively assess the political ability, professionalism and organizational leadership of leading cadres in performing their duties, especially in the process of responding to emergencies and mass incidents.
(3) diligence. Comprehensively assess the mental state and work style of leading cadres, focusing on carrying forward the revolutionary spirit and the spirit of struggle, adhering to the "three strictness and three realities", being diligent and dedicated, conscientious and responsible, grasping quickly, forging ahead, daring to take responsibility, struggling hard and being willing to contribute.
(4) achievements. Comprehensive assessment of leading cadres adhere to the correct concept of political achievements, perform their duties, complete their daily work, undertake urgent and dangerous tasks, deal with complex problems, and cope with major tests and actual results. To assess the performance of Party committee (Party Group) secretaries, we should first pay attention to the effectiveness of Party building work, and to assess the performance of other leading cadres in party member, we should increase the weight of Party building work.
(5) Cheap. Comprehensive assessment of leading cadres to implement the political responsibility of "one post and two responsibilities" in building a clean and honest government, abide by the principles of honesty and self-discipline, take the lead in implementing the spirit of the eight central regulations and their detailed rules for implementation, use the right impartially, establish a good family style, strictly demand relatives and staff around them, and oppose the "four winds" and privileged thoughts and phenomena.
Ninth specific assessment content must be determined on the premise of implementing the spirit of the CPC Central Committee and timely adjusting and optimizing according to the decision-making arrangements of the CPC Central Committee.
Article 10 Implement the new development concept, highlight the orientation of high-quality development, build an index system to promote high-quality development, improve the performance evaluation of high-quality development, set reasonable evaluation indicators and weights for economic and social development performance according to local conditions, highlight the evaluation of tackling key tasks, strengthen the evaluation of deepening supply-side structural reform, ensuring and improving people’s livelihood, strengthening and innovating social governance, promoting innovative development, strengthening the rule of law, and promoting social fairness and justice, and increase safety in production, social stability, and new ones.
Eleventh adhere to the reality, the implementation of grading assessment. The assessment content should reflect the characteristics of leading bodies and cadres in different regions, departments, types and levels.
Twelfth according to the requirements of different job responsibilities, clear leadership and leading cadres do not act as the specific circumstances and evaluation criteria, to promote the implementation of the work and take responsibility.
Thirteenth establish and improve the quantifiable, accountability, accountability of leading bodies and leading cadres work objectives and job responsibilities norms, as an important basis for determining the assessment content.
Chapter III Peacetime Assessment
Fourteenth peacetime assessment is a regular assessment of the daily operation of leading bodies and the consistent performance of leading cadres, and timely affirmation and encouragement, reminding rectification.
Fifteenth peacetime assessment should focus on.
Check the daily operation of the leading group, focusing on understanding the political and ideological construction, implementing democratic centralism, implementing the party’s mass line, making scientific decisions, completing key tasks and opposing the "four winds".
Assess the consistent performance of leading cadres, focusing on understanding political attitudes, responsibility, work ideas and work progress, especially the performance of right and wrong, public and private, true and false, real and virtual.
Sixteenth peacetime assessment is mainly combined with the daily management of leading bodies and leading cadres, and the following ways can be taken:
(a) to attend the democratic life meeting of the leading group, the theoretical study center group study, important work meetings, and participate in important work activities;
(two) talk with the cadres themselves or insiders, and listen to the opinions of the cadres and the masses in their units;
(three) to carry out research visits, special investigations, on-site observation, etc.;
(four) combined with the centralized study and education within the party, the daily supervision of the Commission for Discipline Inspection, patrol inspection, work supervision, cadre training, etc.;
(5) Other appropriate methods.
Seventeenth peacetime assessment can be based on the actual situation to form the assessment results. The assessment results can be determined in the form of assessment report, comments, grades or appraisal.
Eighteenth the establishment of peacetime assessment work files, filing related materials, as an important basis for understanding and evaluating the daily operation of leading bodies and the consistent performance of leading cadres.
Chapter IV Annual Assessment
Nineteenth annual assessment is a comprehensive assessment of leading bodies and leading cadres on an annual basis, which is generally organized at the end of each year or the beginning of the following year.
According to the needs of the work, party committees (party groups) at all levels can select some leading bodies and leading cadres for key assessment every year.
Twentieth annual assessment is generally carried out in accordance with the following procedures:
(a) summary of the work. Hold a meeting, the leading group will summarize and report the work throughout the year, and the leading cadres will make personal debriefing.
(2) democratic evaluation. According to the requirements of the assessment content of leading bodies and leading cadres, the evaluation form is designed, and the evaluation opinions are filled out by the personnel who participate in the democratic evaluation. The scope of personnel participating in the evaluation shall be determined according to the principles of knowledge, relevance and representativeness, combined with the actual situation.
(3) individual conversations. Talk with members of the leading group, relevant cadres and the masses and other personnel who need to participate to understand the situation.
(4) Understanding and verification. According to the need to take access to information, collect relevant data and information, field research and other ways to verify the relevant situation of the assessment object.
(five) the formation of assessment results. Conduct a comprehensive analysis of leading bodies and leading cadres, form assessment results and give timely feedback.
In those years when centralized study and education, general inspection and patrol inspection were carried out within the Party, the annual assessment can be combined with the actual situation to simplify the procedures appropriately.
According to the needs of the work and the actual situation, the leading bodies and leading cadres of public service departments and window units can listen to public opinions within a certain range.
Twenty-first annual assessment results of leading bodies are generally divided into four grades: excellent, good, average and poor. The annual assessment results of leading cadres are divided into four grades: excellent, competent, basically competent and incompetent.
Excellent refers to outstanding comprehensive performance, outstanding performance of leadership responsibilities or job requirements, successful completion of the annual work tasks, and remarkable achievements.
Good, competent refers to the comprehensive performance, conscientiously fulfill the leadership responsibilities or job requirements, and successfully complete the annual work tasks.
General and basic competence means that the comprehensive performance barely meets the leadership responsibilities or job requirements, or there are obvious deficiencies and major problems in a certain aspect.
Poor and incompetent means that the comprehensive performance fails to meet the leadership responsibilities or job requirements, or there are serious problems and major mistakes in a certain aspect.
Party committees (party groups) at all levels shall, in light of the actual situation, formulate specific evaluation criteria for assessment grades.
Twenty-second leading cadres who hold multiple positions are generally assessed in the units that undertake the main job responsibilities, and understand other jobs that are concurrently held in an appropriate way.
Newly promoted leading cadres shall be assessed according to their current posts, and pay attention to their work in their original posts.
The exchange of leading cadres, in the current work unit for assessment, the exchange of information before the appointment provided by the original unit.
Leading cadres who are sent for aid or on-the-job training shall be assessed by places or units that have worked for more than half a year in that year, and the opinions of sending units or receiving units shall be listened to in an appropriate way.
Leading cadres who have accumulated sick leave and personal leave for more than half a year in this year will participate in the annual assessment, with uncertain grades.
Leading cadres who are suspected of violating discipline and law and have been put on file for review and investigation and have not yet been closed, and have been punished by party discipline and government affairs or organized to deal with them, their annual assessment shall be carried out in accordance with relevant regulations.
Chapter V Special Assessment
Twenty-third special assessment is a targeted assessment of the working attitude, responsibility, role and actual results of leading bodies and leading cadres in completing important special work, undertaking urgent and dangerous tasks, and responding to and handling major emergencies.
According to the usual grasp of the situation, the leading bodies and leading cadres with outstanding performance or problems can be specially assessed.
Twenty-fourth special assessment shall generally be carried out in accordance with the following procedures:
(a) to formulate a plan. Clear assessment object, assessment content indicators, procedures and work requirements, etc.
(two) listen to the summary report of the assessment object.
(3) Understanding and verification. Take access to information, field research, public opinion analysis, individual talks, democratic evaluation and other ways to verify the relevant situation, if necessary, you can learn about the situation from the discipline inspection and supervision organs or auditing, letters and visits and other departments.
(four) the formation of assessment results. Evaluate the leading bodies and leading cadres.
Twenty-fifth special assessment results can be determined by assessment reports, comments, grades or identification.
Chapter VI Term Assessment
Twenty-sixth term assessment is a comprehensive assessment of the overall performance of the leading bodies and leading cadres who implement the term system during a term of office, which is generally carried out in combination with the general inspection or the annual assessment of the year when the term expires.
The term assessment should highlight the assessment of the completion of the term goal or the term goal.
Twenty-seventh term assessment should generally be carried out in accordance with the procedures of summing up the work, democratic assessment, individual talks, understanding and verification, performance analysis, and forming assessment results.
Twenty-eighth term assessment results can be determined by assessment reports, comments, grades or identification.
Chapter VII Determination of Assessment Results
Article 29 In determining the assessment results, we should strengthen comprehensive analysis and judgment, adhere to the combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis, comprehensively, historically and dialectically analyze individual contributions and collective roles, subjective efforts and objective conditions, growth rate and quality benefits, outstanding achievements and potential achievements, development achievements and costs, etc., pay attention to understanding the people’s real feelings and evaluation of economic and social development, and prevent the assessment results from being determined simply by ranking regional GDP and growth rate or by voting scores in democratic assessment and opinion polls.
Article 30 The usual assessment, annual assessment, special assessment and term assessment should complement each other, adhere to the combination of examiners and examiners, pay attention to absorbing and using the results of patrol inspection, audit, performance management, work supervision, business assessment of relevant departments, and personal report verification, and regard courage to carry out tasks, willingness to do things, and ability to act as important criteria for identifying cadres and judging pros and cons, so as to enhance the authenticity and accuracy of assessment results.
Thirty-first assessment results should fully and accurately reflect the situation of the assessment object. If the results are determined in the form of assessment reports, comments and appraisals, the achievements and advantages should be clearly and specifically affirmed, and the problems and shortcomings should be pointed out.
Thirty-second annual assessment results are based on the usual assessment results, and the excellent grades of annual assessment should be produced among the assessment objects with good assessment results.
The proportion of outstanding grades in the annual assessment of leading bodies generally does not exceed 30% of the total number of leading bodies participating in the assessment, and the proportion of outstanding grades in the annual assessment of leading cadres generally does not exceed 25% of the total number of leading cadres participating in the assessment.
If the leading group is of excellent grades, the proportion of its leading members rated as excellent grades may be appropriately raised to a maximum of 30%; If the leading group is of general grades, the proportion of its leading members rated as excellent grades shall not exceed 20%, and the main person in charge shall generally not be determined as excellent grades; If the leading group is of poor grades, the proportion of its leading members rated as excellent grades shall not exceed 15%, and the main person in charge shall generally not be determined as competent and above.
Thirty-third under any of the following circumstances, the annual assessment results of leading bodies and leading cadres shall not be determined as excellent:
(a) the implementation of the decision-making and deployment of the CPC Central Committee has not achieved obvious results;
(two) the entrepreneurial spirit of the director is not enough, and he is afraid of the heavy, suffering from the loss, afraid to face the contradiction directly, unwilling to move the real thing, and not taking inaction;
(three) by the superior party committee and government informed criticism, ordered to check;
(four) the work performance is not outstanding;
(five) the organization and leadership ability is weak, and the annual work objectives and tasks are not well completed;
(6) Failing to fulfill the responsibility of managing the Party and violating the rules of honesty and self-discipline;
(seven) other reasons should not be determined as excellent.
In the appraisal work of grass-roots party building debriefing carried out by higher-level party organizations, if the secretary of the party committee (party group) fails to achieve a good comprehensive evaluation of grass-roots party building work, the annual assessment results shall not be determined as excellent.
Article 34 Under any of the following circumstances, the annual assessment results of leading bodies shall be determined as poor, and the annual assessment results of leading cadres shall be determined as incompetent:
(a) violation of political discipline and rules, political problems;
(two) do not implement democratic centralism, the leading group is not in good condition, can not normally play its functional role, leading cadres make unprincipled disputes, and the impact is poor;
(three) poor sense of responsibility, low level of ability, unable to perform or incompetent job responsibilities, and major problems in performing their duties according to law;
(four) the attitude is too high, the action is too little, the implementation is poor, the responsibility is perfunctory, the image of the style is not good, and the opinions of the masses are great, causing adverse effects;
(five) do not stick to their jobs, AWOL;
(six) other reasons should be determined as poor or incompetent.
Thirty-fifth leading bodies and leading cadres in the performance of their duties, reform and innovation in the process of mistakes, after comprehensive analysis to give fault tolerance, it should be objective evaluation, reasonably determine the assessment results.
Thirty-sixth assessment objects have objections to the assessment results, you can put forward a review or appeal in accordance with the relevant provisions.
Chapter VIII Application of Assessment Results
Article 37 Adhere to the combination of examination and application, and combine the examination results with selection and appointment, training and education, management and supervision, encouragement and restraint, accountability and accountability, etc., encourage the advanced, spur the backward, promote the promotion and demotion, promote the responsibility, and severely treat the mediocre and the lazy.
Thirty-eighth assessment results take the form of individual talks, work briefings, meeting comments, etc., and feed back to the leading bodies and leading cadres realistically, affirm the achievements, point out the shortcomings, urge rectification, conduct pressure and stimulate motivation.
Thirty-ninth according to the assessment results, strengthen the construction of leading bodies:
(a) the leadership has made important contributions, in accordance with the relevant provisions of merit, awarded the title, give material rewards;
(two) outstanding performance of the leadership or the annual assessment results are excellent, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the award;
(three) the leading group is in poor operation, the cohesion and combat effectiveness are not strong, and the cadres and the masses have great opinions, which should be adjusted;
(4) If the annual assessment results of the leading bodies are of average grades, they shall be instructed to write a written report to the higher-level party organizations, analyze the reasons and make rectification;
(5) If the annual assessment results of the leading bodies are poor or average for two consecutive years, the principal responsible persons and relevant responsible persons shall be adjusted.
Fortieth according to the assessment results, encourage and restrain leading cadres:
(a) leading cadres who have made significant contributions can record merit, award titles and give material rewards in accordance with relevant regulations; Outstanding performance or the annual assessment results are excellent, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the award; For three consecutive years, if it is excellent, it will be awarded Class III merit, and it will be given priority under the same conditions.
(2) If the annual assessment results of leading cadres are competent or above, they shall enjoy the annual assessment bonus, promotion salary grade and salary grade in accordance with relevant regulations.
(3) If the annual assessment results of leading cadres are basically competent, they shall be admonished and improved within a time limit.
(four) if the annual assessment results of leading cadres are incompetent, they will be reduced to one post or rank level in accordance with the prescribed procedures.
(5) If you don’t participate in the annual assessment, participate in the annual assessment with uncertain grades, or the annual assessment results are basically competent or below, the year will not be counted as the service years for promotion to the post rank, and will not be counted as the assessment years for promotion to the salary grade and salary grade.
(six) leading cadres are not suitable for their current posts, and should be adjusted according to relevant regulations.
Article 41 Strengthen the education and training of cadres according to the assessment results, and adjust the learning and training of leading cadres according to the principle of "what is lacking" and arrange practical exercises to fill the shortcomings of ability and quality. Strengthen targeted training for outstanding young cadres with potential.
Forty-second assessment found that there are problems in the leading bodies and leading cadres, distinguish between different situations, to talk to remind until the organization to deal with; Find clues about violations of discipline and law and transfer them to discipline inspection and supervision and judicial organs for handling.
Forty-third leading cadres assessment of the formation of conclusive materials, should be deposited in the cadre personnel files.
Chapter IX Organization and Implementation
Forty-fourth party committees (party groups) and their organizations (personnel) departments shall perform the duties of assessing leading bodies and leading cadres in accordance with the management authority of cadres.
The Party Committee (Party Group) undertakes the main responsibility of the assessment work, and the secretary of the Party Committee (Party Group) is the first responsible person, and the organization (personnel) department undertakes specific work responsibilities.
Forty-fifth examiners should have high ideological and political quality, competent policy level and professional knowledge, fair and upright, strong sense of organizational discipline and confidentiality. Examiners shall, in accordance with the regulations, avoid official duties.
According to the needs of the work, the Party Committee (Party Group) can set up and send an assessment team. The leader of the assessment team shall be determined and authorized according to each assessment task, and shall have strong organizational and leadership skills, adhere to principles and dare to take responsibility.
Forty-sixth the implementation of assessment responsibility system.
Assessment personnel should conscientiously perform their duties, conduct assessment in accordance with the prescribed procedures and requirements, comprehensively, objectively and accurately understand and reflect the situation, and treat and evaluate leading bodies and leading cadres fairly and fairly.
The appraisers shall sign the appraisal materials and be responsible for the objectivity and authenticity of the appraisal materials.
Forty-seventh the organization and implementation of the assessment work should be serious, prudent and prudent, and pay attention to coordination and promotion with daily work. According to different assessment objects and tasks, we should improve innovative assessment methods, give full play to democracy, listen to opinions and understand the situation among grassroots cadres and the masses, and insist on seeing specific things on the spot, and understand and verify the actual performance of leading bodies and leading cadres through multiple channels, levels and aspects.
Forty-eighth organizations (personnel) departments should strengthen the information construction of assessment work, make full use of Internet technology and information technology to carry out assessment, and improve the quality and efficiency of work.
Article 49 Party committees (leading groups) at all levels should strengthen the unified leadership, overall coordination, supervision and guidance on the assessment of cadres in their own departments and units and other business assessments in their own regions, integrate assessment forces, merge assessment items and types, strictly control the "one-vote veto" items, and prevent multiple assessments and repeated assessments.
Chapter X Discipline and Supervision
Fiftieth assessment work must strictly abide by the following disciplines:
(a) are not allowed to engage in form, go through the motions;
(two) are not allowed to conceal or distort the facts;
(three) are not allowed to resort to deceit;
(four) are not allowed to engage in non-organizational activities;
(five) are not allowed to disclose the contents of the conversation, evaluation results and other assessment work secrets;
(six) it is not allowed to evaluate cadres, decide or change the assessment results based on personal likes and dislikes;
(seven) are not allowed to take advantage of the assessment for personal gain;
(eight) are not allowed to interfere with or hinder the assessment work;
(nine) no retaliation against cadres and personnel who reflect the problem.
Fifty-first leading bodies and leading cadres should correctly treat and accept organizational assessment, truthfully report their work and thoughts and objectively reflect the situation.
For those who do not participate in or seriously cooperate with the assessment work as required, and still do not make corrections after education, the annual assessment results of leading bodies are directly determined as poor grades, and the annual assessment results of leading cadres are directly determined as incompetent grades.
Article 52 If the assessment is not organized in accordance with the regulations, and the assessment work is distorted and inaccurate, resulting in serious consequences, the unhealthy trend in the assessment work of the local departments and units is serious, the cadres and the masses strongly reflect it, and the behavior of violating the assessment work discipline is not properly investigated, the party committee (party group) and its organization (personnel) departments shall be held responsible, as well as the relevant leading members and persons directly responsible.
Article 53 Anyone who violates these regulations shall be criticized and educated according to the seriousness of the case, ordered to check, informed criticism, admonished, adjusted or dealt with according to the rules and regulations, and those suspected of violating discipline or duty-related crimes shall be dealt with according to relevant disciplines and laws and regulations.
Article 54 Party committees (party groups), discipline inspection and supervision organs and organization (personnel) departments shall strengthen supervision and inspection of assessment work, consciously accept supervision by the masses and public opinion, seriously accept relevant reports, reviews and complaints, and seriously investigate and deal with violations of assessment work discipline.
Chapter XI Supplementary Provisions
Article 55 The provisions of these Regulations on working departments shall also apply to the offices, agencies, ad hoc organizations and other directly affiliated institutions of the Party committees and governments.
Article 56 The Organization Department of the CPC Central Committee shall be responsible for the interpretation of these Regulations.
Article 57 These Regulations shall come into force on April 7, 2019. The Interim Provisions on the Assessment of Leading Cadres of the Party and Government issued by the Organization Department of the CPC Central Committee on May 26, 1998, and the Measures for the Annual Assessment of Leading Groups and Leading Cadres of the Party and Government (for Trial Implementation) issued by the Organization Department of the CPC Central Committee on July 16, 2009 shall be abolished at the same time. Previously issued provisions on the assessment of leading bodies and leading cadres, which are inconsistent with these regulations, shall be implemented in accordance with these regulations.
Reporting/feedback